Ohjaus:
George Roy HillKäsikirjoitus:
David S. WardKuvaus:
Robert SurteesNäyttelijät:
Paul Newman, Robert Redford, Robert Shaw, Charles Durning, Ray Walston, Eileen Brennan, Harold Gould, John Heffernan, Dana Elcar, Jack Kehoe (lisää)Suoratoistopalvelut (5)
Juonikuvaukset(1)
Robert Redford and Paul Newman star as two con men in the 1930's out to avenge the death of a friend. They seek revenge on a crime lord (Robert Shaw) with a "sting" that is one of the greatest double-crosses in movie history, complete with an amazing surprise finish. (jakelijan virallinen teksti)
Videot (1)
Arvostelut (8)
Overpopulated. While at least half of the characters are absolutely superfluous. They think they’re clever. But you can read them like a book at first glance. A star-studded cast. But Redford has no part to act and next to Newman and Shaw he clearly can’t keep up. Theatrical, obviously studio set, with errors of logic and who knows what else. And despite all of that, it’s entertaining with stylish ease that we don’t see much of today. Simply an Oscar-winning romp by a group of friends for the hell of it.
()
Perhaps the film's screenplay is a bit too focused on creating an impact, and everything fits together so neatly that it gives the impression of being contrived. However, the charming directorial presentation makes this film irresistibly alluring, and not humming the title song even a day after watching it would be almost sinful. The duo of Newman and Redford shines, and without them, the film wouldn't even be a quarter of what it is. Every smile or line they deliver instantly etches itself into memory, and perhaps it would be enough for the film if those two just sat opposite each other and looked at each other. Despite the fact that at times, the pace could use a little more push, and in some places, the sharp edges of the "effect" could be refined, it still remains the most elegantly crafted "con film" ever to grace the silver screen, with minimal flaws and no major criticisms.
()
The forerunner of all overly complicated con flicks that can't stand a chance next to The Sting. Thanks to the twinkles in the eyes of Robert Redford and Paul Newman, we are left with only one question that is already answered – has the feeling of satisfaction ever been this great?
()
Yes, I know it's a completely different genre and that aside from the actors and director, the films have nothing in common, but I just like Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid better. The Sting is a good film, I don't deny that, but it would have impressed me even more if I hadn't guessed the "final scam" as soon as the two men started it. So there was no "wow!" effect...
()
I don't tend to return to projects that I have rated with fewer than 4 stars. However, those with more stars are worth watching again, and as I observed a long time ago, approximately after ten years it is also suitable to rewatch a film because with increasing age we perceive some things differently. Usually, my memories deceive me and I end up giving them a worse review, but in the case of The Sting, even after a third viewing, I didn't have to change the smallest thing about my high opinion. The Sting is an elegant film, it has charm and style, and it's simply a pleasant positive ride that would work even if any other quality actors had been cast instead of Newman and Redford. It relies on an excellent script, a great retro atmosphere, and perfect filmmaking. Only in a minimum number of films can you trace such precise work by individual filmmakers' professions. I watch and admire the great camerawork, the musical motif, the fantastic casting even for the smallest roles, the work of the architect, and the great direction. This is simply a tribute to the art of cinema in its purest form. All those Ocean's Eleven films and countless variations of the same can get lost. Overall impression: 95%.
()
Mainos