Ohjaus:
Zack SnyderKuvaus:
Larry FongSävellys:
Tyler BatesNäyttelijät:
Billy Crudup, Malin Åkerman, Carla Gugino, Patrick Wilson, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Jackie Earle Haley, Matthew Goode, Matt Frewer, Stephen McHattie (lisää)Suoratoistopalvelut (4)
Juonikuvaukset(1)
Huikea toimintaseikkailu sijoittuu vuoden 1985 kuvitteelliseen maailmaan, jossa supersankarit ovat luonnollinen osa yhteiskuntaa ja Yhdysvaltojen välit Neuvostoliittoon ovat kiristyneet äärimmilleen. Kun maailmanjärjestyksen vartijoihin kuuluvan määrätietoisen Roscharchin kollega saa surmansa, hän ryhtyy penkomaan supersankareiden häpäisyyn ja murhaamiseen tähtäävää juonta ja kokoaa ympärilleen sankariryhmän vanhoista kollegoistaan. (Nelonen Media)
(lisää)Videot (10)
Arvostelut (17)
Liian pitkitetty, liikaa turhaa puhetta ja liian vähän toimintaa sekä pulaa kunnon hurjista sankareista, joihin katsoja voi niin sanotusti kiintyä. Elokuvan parhaat osat taitavat valitettavasti olla tekstitykset ja muutama ensimmäinen minuutti. Jonkin ajan kuluttua jouduin lisäämään tähtiä. Ärsyttävä täytehöttö on jo aikaa sitten haihtunut päästäni, ja jäljellä ovat hyvät muistot parhaista kohtauksista.
()
A complex, smart, R-rated comic-book gem. I’m quite surprised by the talk about the complexity of the film, I was afraid that I would get lost because I don’t know Moore’s original. But I didn’t have any trouble and nobody capable of paying attention to a film should, either. Watchmen captivated me in several ways: the intellectual and visual aspects, the brutality and how uncompromising it is. Awesome!
()
The biggest surprise in years. I don't really like Snyder (300 will confirm that) and I don't know the comic books, so this seemed to be a first-class head-on collision. But after completing three hours and thirty-five minutes in the Watchmen world, I'm just in awe. I'm in awe of the narrative structure Snyder chose, how he chose rich mythology over a straightforward plot, I'm in awe of the depth of the individual characters, I'm in awe of the absolutely brilliant compositions (Hollis's last duel, in which he projects the glorious strokes of his life, Rorschach's conversion into a mask in the lair of a pedophile), I'm in awe of how Snyder transformed the indigestible fetishism and effectiveness into an incredibly coherent and aesthetically polished whole (the title sequence rolls radically, I'm speechless), I'm in awe of the inclusion of the pure comic book insert Black Freighter, which fantastically resonates with the overall tuning of the film... I'm in awe, even though there's a few unnecessary shots, a couple of deranged ties and unnecessary masturbation. I'm in awe of a film which I rank, alongside Nolan's Batman films, among the top three comic book movies that have ever hit the silver screen. I don't even know if I'm sad that I didn't see it in the movie theatre, because those nearly four hours of TV were almost a spiritual experience of pure ecstasy from post-modern mythology...
()
[Full disclosure: I’ve never read the comic books] Twenty percent of the running time comprises the events that actually happen in the film, while 80% consists of flashbacks familiarizing us with the characters, who didn’t grow on me and of whom only one – Rorschach – is well-written and acted (i.e. interesting). There is virtually no action here, but everything is wrapped up in beautiful visuals full of imaginative montages and slow motion shots with a feeling of fantasy, where nothing is impossible and where a neon blue superhero is constantly philosophizing about something very clever beyond the understanding of us Earthlings. Through the first third of Watchmen, I was filled with awe and excitement (and pleasantly surprised by the amount of sex and violence and the moral depravity of the main characters), but I was looking forward to the end of the flashbacks and the start of a proper film adventure. As there was no change in the second third, I started to feel bored and irritated. I literally suffered through the final third. Had I been the producer of this megalomaniacal political, (pseudo) philosophical, fantasy conversational, R-rated flick, I’d off myself.
()
Untouched by the comics, but with thoughts of both Gilliam and Greengrass, I end up being thankful for Zack Snyder, who has grown as a filmmaker in his third film. While he was enabled by an obviously strong premise or rather its script treatment, the way Snyder presents the vast world of rejected superheroes is breathtaking. It’s a powerful reflection on America with an almost meditative thought about humans in general. It is based on excellent dialogue by a group of fresh-faced actors who are occasionally sent into excellent action sequences by the director. Rorschach's rendezvous with the cops took me far beyond mere viewer ecstasy. I left the movie theater very pensive, but a day later I was cheering and I know I have to see it at least one more time. Edit I: It was worth it. It's been a long time since I've experienced a second screening of a film that I've enjoyed so intensely. Edit II The D.C. version is "only" a gourmet cherry on top.
()
Mainos