Ohjaus:
Danny BoyleKäsikirjoitus:
Simon BeaufoyKuvaus:
Anthony Dod MantleSävellys:
A.R. RahmanNäyttelijät:
Dev Patel, Saurabh Shukla, Freida Pinto, Anil Kapoor, Rajendranath Zutshi, Irrfan Khan, Azharuddin Mohammed Ismail, Ayush Mahesh Khedekar (lisää)Suoratoistopalvelut (3)
Juonikuvaukset(1)
Jamal Malik, 18-vuotias orpo Mumbain slummeista, on vain yhden kysymyksen päässä 20 miljoonan rupian päävoitosta Intian "Haluatko miljonääriksi?" –ohjelmassa. Hänet pidätetään epäiltynä huijauksesta, ja hän kertoo poliisikuulustelussa uskomattoman tarinan elämästään kaduilla – ja tytöstä jota hän rakastaa mutta jonka hän kadotti. Miksi poika, jota ei tunnu kiinnostavan raha osallistuu ohjelmaan? Ja miten hän voi tietää kaikki vastaukset? (SF Film Fin.)
(lisää)Arvostelut (15)
Slumdog Millionaire is essentially the new Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon. It will be just as influential. It is a love story from an exotic corner of the world, which the ordinary viewer would otherwise never see, told in a universal language. And the Indians will try to convince you (as the Chinese tried to do at the time) that they have been making such films for decades. No, they haven’t. Someone had to come from abroad and take out their Western European lens. Slumdog Millionaire is not a Bollywood film, but a firework-like celebration of Bollywood as a film culture with all its romanticism. In its beautiful love story, Slumdog Millionaire fully utilizes the splendors and miseries of the Indian microcosm, thus making it attractive for the audience in an imaginative and fresh way. It is a small and unobtrusive film gem that shines more than any Los Angeles jewelry store where Benjamin Button goes shopping. Slumdog Millionaire is a movie celebrating life, faith and positive thinking; a movie that wasn’t made to become the award-winning film of the year... and that is why it deserves it. Nowadays this film is a small miracle. And Danny Boyle is a god. P.S: Jen Lopez and Rosario Dawson might have Freida Pinto’s features but not her eyes. No Hollywood actress has Freida Pinto’s eyes...
()
A naive, clichéd and predictable fairy tale about how a poor boy came to happiness. Boyle's film captivates with the sweeping realities of contemporary, overpopulated India, but otherwise has little else to offer. The childhood scenes are excellent, full of life and filmmaking passion, but the rest follows the same routine as many other films, without a hint of surprise, suspense or believable emotions. Bollywood came to Hollywood with a bang and everyone sat on their asses. Not me, though, sorry.
()
A charming film with an amazing atmosphere that warms the heart and caresses the soul. I don’t think the comparisons with City of God are that appropriate, even though they are logical. Whereas City of God is a cold and cumbersome construct without personality, Slumdog Millionaire is a warm, viewer friendly and, above all, brisk fairytale that doesn’t have any big message, but it’s all the more honest because of that. Danny Boyle has proven many times that he’s a visual wizard, but now he delivers a perfect fusion of images and music. Basically, in every scene with an important song all I could do was watch the screen with admiration and amazement – so many ideas and tricks is not something you see every day. I don’t think it’s a worthy best film of the year, but the direction really does deserve an award.
()
Danny Boyle got rid of Alex Garland and brought a cheap fairy tale to the West, exactly according to the Bollywood model. Its aesthetics of dirty slums and the search for happiness in it obviously earn touching moments with the audience, standing applause, and gilded statuettes. Unfortunately, to me, it smells of cheap calculation, which is only kept afloat by the fantastic passage with the little kids, which is funny and sad, and above all real, which cannot be said about the rest. It’s not that I don't appreciate the effort, but I yawned through the efforts of this hypocritical world - the visuals are like one of Tony Scott's Mexican trips and the good music (Boyle’s trademark) is nowhere to be found. I understand the general enthusiasm, I just don't share it.
()
An exploitative film... a selectively filmed and sounded demonstration of colonial fantasy with added value in the form of purifying catharsis. Slumdog Millionaire doesn't say anything about India, it's just borrowing it as padding in sympathetic shrapnel aimed at Western audiences. The essence of contemporary ideological escapism, however riveting technically. I don't believe anything about that movie. Boyle's obsession with the invisible hand of fate is typical from this point of view - just garish colors on an empty concrete block of a "guaranteed hit".
()
A Brit-Bollywood remake of the Czech fairytale movie O chytrém Honzovi (= Clever Jack). This could be called Clever Jamal or How a Poor Guy with Common Sense Found Happiness and it is extremely good and enlightening. But didn’t it bend the truth whenever it could (mainly in the live transmissions) for the crude purpose of wringing your heart strings? Yes, but who cares in a fairytale, huh kids? P.S.: And isn’t the book better than the movie? No, it’s not. Because Swarup’s work is something completely different. Some black humor, cynicism and a message that is the exact opposite of Boyle’s ever so sweet, naive candy cane. And I like that kind of thing more than fairytales...
()
An inexact celluloid carousel of life. Crime, fate, tension, and personal drama. And above all, a cautious love story, which is precisely the decisive factor that separates Slumdog Millionaire from other biographical stories. Accompanied by a soundtrack on the verge of dynamic Danny Boyle style and a fascinating orchestra, it becomes clear that the audience needs "human stories". Thank goodness for that.
()
A strong story, what can I say; yet I don't know why, but it felt rather jagged, lacking. Lacking what? I don't know, I didn't find it that earth-shaking. Probably because I've seen stories like this before, heard stories like this before. Let the film enjoy its Oscars, which are well deserved I'm sure, but for me it's not the winner of the "Best Picture" category for 2008. That prize goes to a different one.
()
So here we have it. Bollywood has been on the rise for a long time, India has improved economically in the last ten years and the country has created a large middle class with quality education and therefore higher demands on the quality of film stories. At the same time, thanks to globalization, Bollywood producers have started to feel the need to break into foreign markets and it was necessary to come up with more sophisticated plots than the original Bollywood kitschy romances with songs and dances, which were completely indigestible for the Euro-American viewer. The film Slumdog Millionaire combines classic Bollywood motifs including romance, action, and melodrama, but at the same time brings them to the Western viewer in a very attractive way thanks to top-notch editing, excellent camerawork, casting, acting performances, and music. In terms of content, it's just a kitschy fairy tale for me, against which I could raise many legitimate objections, but considering the technical aspects, it deserves three stars. Slumdog Millionaire is not about current India and the life of its inhabitants, but about how the director and consequently the viewer want to see it. I like certain types of fairy tales, like Forrest Gump or Amelie, but Slumdog Millionaire takes itself too seriously for my taste and tries to evoke emotions where irony would be appropriate. I am not the first to notice the obvious contrivance of the plot, where the screenwriter and director interpret the rules of the game, which must have the same format globally, as it suits them, and strongly violates logic. Overall impression: 60%. The success of Boyle's film shows that the audience still wants to be moved and that the stories that the screenwriters and filmmakers came up with in the 1930s-1950s can be recycled in modified exotic settings. I have no problem with it receiving technical Oscar awards, but Slumdog Millionaire is definitely not the best film of the year. It certainly has decent craftsmanship, but art should look different. The much more justified Oscar went to last year's masterpiece by the Coen brothers No Country for Old Men.
()
A cleverly told fairy tale about a) luck, b) faith, c) life, d) Who Wants to be a Millionaire, which can catch a person’s attention even though they don’t particularly like this kind of sob story. This is a story about a tiny squirt Jamal whose life led him on the journey of answers, which Danny Boyle managed to capture to the very last detail. He managed beautifully to portray the ludicrousness of the civilized world, where, for instance, after one drastic scene from childhood, the show host cracks a cheap joke. The actors are well cast too, both the small ones, and Dev Patel himself, with the beautiful Frida Pinto. P.S.: Did you notice those questions aimed at an English-speaking audience at the end of the contest?
()
For the blown bubble. We can think of it as another Bride and Prejudice, a film that will point you towards the real India. At least A.R. Rahman and Anil Kapoor are good here. Irrfan Khan is fine, and in retrospect, it appears that Dev and Freida have a promising future.
()
Enthusiastic, sincere, and full of life, with captivating music and the gritty realities of Asia. But it felt like a somewhat cynical affair, where the director is well aware, despite all the spontaneity, that this is exactly what people want to see. Does it work? Obviously yes, so where’s the problem? Definitely an extraordinary film worth seeing.
()
Academics love their fairy tales. And because Slumdog Millionaire is a model fairy tale, they gave it eight of those golden boys. I don't blame them at all, because it's a beautiful film, and what does it matter that you know how it's going to turn out from the very beginning? Danny Boyle did an amazing job with Jamal's simple story. He impressively mixes funny episodes with dramatic ones, he lets everything be underscored by perfectly chosen music and gives us the opportunity to sit, watch, keep our fingers crossed and hold our breath during the final question (which could have been different, but then again it wouldn't have been such a nice fairy tale then, would it?) and the hint from the friend on the phone.
()
An authentically told story from the most dangerous slums of India, with a young man's desire to win the girl of his dreams in the foreground and background. The idea of inserting one of the world's most popular contests into the very centre of the plot was a safe choice, and Danny Boyle has mastered his role as director to perfection. The film offers a certain reflection a number of times, "everything bad turns to good in the end!" And it does! Even the dirtiest s*it has a human heart and morals. In short, a film that, willy-nilly, captured me practically full on – especially with its sincerity and grace – so kudos to all involved in the making it.
()
I wouldn't give it 100%, but 95%, only because I think the book is slightly better. This is a film that compelled me to read the book, for which I am grateful as well. It’s a great drama with humor that demonstrates how wonderful films can be made in India. Well-chosen actors and everything is in its place. A beautifully cruel, gritty romance, and a stunning story. This is a film you'll like to recall now and then because you can always discover something more in it.
()
Mainos