Ohjaus:
Sylvester StalloneKuvaus:
Jeffrey L. KimballSävellys:
Brian TylerNäyttelijät:
Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Jet Li, Dolph Lundgren, Eric Roberts, Randy Couture, Steve Austin, David Zayas, Giselle Itié, Charisma Carpenter (lisää)Suoratoistopalvelut (3)
Juonikuvaukset(1)
Joukko palkkasotilaita saa tehtäväkseen soluttautua eteläamerikkalaiseen saarivaltioon ja syöstä maan häikäilemätön diktaattori vallasta. Kun operaatio käynnistyy, miehille selviää, ettei kaikki ole sitä miltä näyttää. Kun heidän tehtävänsä epäonnistuu ja viaton ihmishenki on uhattuna, miehet joutuvat kohtaamaan uuden, entistä kovemman haasteen, kun palkkasotilaat itse joutuvat tulilinjalle. Barney Ross (Sylvester Stallone) on mies, jolla ei ole mitään hävittävää. Hän on palkkasotilaiden ryhmän peloton johtaja, joka ei turhia tunteile – Barneyn ainoat lähimmäiset ovat hänen pick-upinsa, vesitasonsa ja tiiminsä, ryhmä nykypäivän sotureita ja hänen lojaaleja työtovereitaan. Pesunkestävänä kyynikkona Barney kutsuu työtään "tahranpoistoksi". Hänen tiimiinsä kuuluvat entinen erikoisjoukkojen sotilas ja teräaseiden asiantuntija Lee Christmas (Jason Statham), lähitaistelun mestari Yin Yang (Jet Li), ampuma-aseiden ekspertti Hale Caesar (Terry Crews), räjähdysaineet tunteva Toll Road (Randy Couture) ja Gunnar Jensen (Dolph Lundgren), tarkka-ampuja ja taisteluissa kunnostautunut veteraani, jolla on omat demoninsa riesanaan. Kun Barney ottaa vastaan komennuksen, jota kukaan muu ei suostu hoitamaan, hän ja hänen tiiminsä uskovat olevansa menossa suorittamaan rutiinikeikkaa. Tavoitteena on syöstä vallasta pienen Vilenan saarivaltion murhanhimoinen diktaattori kenraali Gaza (David Zayas) ja päättää sotilasjuntan hirmuhallinto. Tiedusteluretkellä Vilenassa Barney ja Christmas tapaavat paikallisen vapaustaistelijan Sandran (Giselle Itie), nuoren naisen jolla on synkkä salaisuus. Pian heille selviää, että kulissien takana lankoja pitelee käsissään entinen CIA:n agentti James Monroe (Eric Roberts) ja tämän rikostoveri Paine (Steven Austin). Kun tehtävä epäonnistuu ja Barney ja Christmas joutuvat vaikeuksiin, heidän on jätettävä Sandra vihollisten armoille. Kohtalokasta virhettään katuva Barney ei saa rauhaa ennen kuin onnistuu taivuttelemaan ryhmänsä palaamaan Vilenaan, pelastamaan panttivangin ja saattamaan työnsä päätökseen. (Future film)
(lisää)Videot (5)
Arvostelut (11)
Satisfaction for me on all fronts. From the fighters’ hangout (admittedly, the church scene could have been a minute or two longer), to the witty banter and poking fun at themselves, to the sheer action-packed charge that always kicks in at the right moment. You could criticize it for all sorts of things, but the same also applies to classic nostalgic films. At times I felt like clapping loudly and shouting at the whole movie theater. Particularly the "fistfight" at the end was asking for it permanently. 4 1/2. I think I'll go see it again. Edit: I went again and the enthusiasm has lessened. I’m bothered a bit by the tediousness of the first half and the neglect of some of the team members (Couture, Crews). But from the moment Stallone breaks into the basement dungeon, it's one of the action highlights of (probably not only) the year. Regarding the fun factor, though, Joe Carnahan otherwise won...
()
The script was so stupid and leaky that even 80 of them couldn't carry it. The church scene was great though, no question about it. But afterwards? I'll quote Subjective: “shot, ‘pow’, shot, ‘bang’, shot, ‘smack’, shot, ‘left hook’, shot, ‘right hook’, shot, ‘tie’, shot ‘crane’. By the time I understood where the action was happening, I was already watching it from somewhere else." Most of the time I didn't care who was doing the shooting, or why (because the reasons were either nonexistent or stupid and pathetic), and because the shooting went on for most of the movie... I'll watch the second one, it's supposedly better; but I guess since I was looking forward to it so much, it ended up being very, very disappointing. A weak 2 stars.
()
I hope someday they publish a collector’s edition on an over-played VHS videotape with the special Czech “speed-dubbing" and normal editing. Then and only then can these be considered to be the real McCoy action movies “like out of the eighties". But as it is half way between a pleasant movie playing at being nostalgic and real, unadulterated nostalgia (the church, the church!). But it has three main problems. Too much “Bournesque" editing, too little work with the personality cults of various testosterone legends (this happens only in scenes with Jet vs. Dolph and in the church) and of course the must fundamental problem - no Asia Argento, but instead (no) Charisma.
()
Films of this kind can never excite me, already from their very basic nature – heroes that only rely on their muscles can never be heroes to me (and they aren’t). The Expendables are a celebration of dumb brute force – and a pretty expendable film as far as I’m concerned. Long live modern action films that rely on something other than how long and how often a hero on ‘roids can drop “funny” wisecracks. Back in the 80s, that may have had its charm (which I can feel even today when I watch those old films), but I don’t see any reason to go back to that. PS: The church scene was incredibly artificial and forced, like the rest of the film. PS2: The inferno at the end is pretty cool in the details but utterly confusing as a whole.
()
Paradoxically, it should have been even duller and more straightforward. The film is particularly damaging by the pursuit of a sophisticated motivation for a lifelong killer who wants to save at least a piece of his empty soul. In Rambo IV, Stallone drowned it in blood and bulldog focus, here the film struggles with it and has trouble explaining to the viewer why the characters are where they are and why they do what they do. Regardless, The Expendables looks like disparate testosterone action sketches and a spelling-book of "meta-movie" catchphrases (the more you know the map of the 80s, the more you enjoy them). The event is solidly physical, but confusing in places for my taste – those attempts at "Greengrass kinetics" – and rushed. The film is also lacking the 80’s drive in the style of "you killed my uncle, so I’m going to hurt you now". I had a good time, but I couldn't shake the feeling that Stallone didn't cross the magic line and fall into that retro river completely. Sometimes he seems to try to "talk" his way into it unnecessarily when the door needs to be kicked in. That's why I'm hesitating about giving it a fourth star.
()
Mainos