Ohjaus:
Darren AronofskyKäsikirjoitus:
Darren AronofskyKuvaus:
Matthew LibatiqueSävellys:
Clint MansellNäyttelijät:
Sean Gullette, Mark Margolis, Ben Shenkman, Ajay Naidu, Stephen Pearlman, Clint Mansell, Lauren Fox, Ari Handel, Scott Franklin, Oren Sarch (lisää)Suoratoistopalvelut (2)
Juonikuvaukset(1)
A mathematician, Max Cohen, is on the verge of decoding the numerical pattern beneath the ultimate system of ordered chaos--the stock market. However, as he works, he is being pursued by an aggressive Wall Street firm set on stealing the code in order to dominate the financial landscape. Also in the hunt for Max's secrets are a Kabbalah sect intent on unlocking the secrets behind their ancient holy texts. Racing to crack the code, Max succeeds only to find he has a secret everyone is willing to kill for. (jakelijan virallinen teksti)
(lisää)Arvostelut (8)
What Aronofsky started here, he later perfected in Requiem for a Dream. While the directorial invention here falls far short of the quality of his later work, it gives a hint of the direction Darren Aronofsky's work would take. Once again, a very compelling theme, this time about the boundary between genius and the pursuit of knowledge that turns into uncontrollable madness, is wrapped in a nerve-wracking atmosphere through which the viewer is introduced to the shaky and ever-worsening psychological state of the protagonist. 85%
()
Grand existential truths, wrapped up in seemingly indecipherable mathematical equations. And in a spectacular display of filmmaking. By combining black-and-white images and penetrating sounds, Darren Aronofsky works wonders, just as he did in Requiem for a Dream.
()
Insane weirdness that sucks you in at the beginning and spits you out absolutely exhausted by the end. It’s one of those films that I don’t really know how to judge, I could give it two or even four stars with a clean conscience. The combination of black and white images, psychotic music and the various noises in the background works wonders, while the short runtime makes Pi something relatively bearable. I’ll never watch it again, though, I’m not a fan of maths, and letting someone make me feel depressed voluntarily isn’t among favourite activities, either. My rating is something between 40 and 80 percent…
()
3.141592... Our school teacher claimed that math is fun - but, as Aronofsky proves here in this stylized rollercoaster ride, she was lying, because math can make you go completely psycho. A very Lynch-style movie and, whether or not it corresponds to your taste in movies, it will certainly leave a deep impression in you. Primarily thanks to the extraordinarily portrayed atmosphere of paranoia (or whatever that feeling is called). While the viewer experience isn’t so intense throughout the movie, you will be haunted by Pi for a long time after. Probably for as long as it takes you to say the entire value of π.
()
Come on... let’s calculate the whole world! Darren Aronofsky packaged the basic truths of existence and being in an atmospheric cape full of paranoia, migraines and, of course, mathematics. + A great soundtrack. 3.14 will never look the same again. 12:50, press return.
()
Another disappointment from Darren Aronofsky. I almost can't believe the same guy made the great The Fountain. Pi is stupid. A nonsensical bluff about a genius mathematician whose seizures are nothing like the hallucinations from Requiem for a Dream (yes, they are also as long, expected and headache-inducing) and who spends the whole time poring over numbers that perhaps 99% of the audience cannot understand, but the director keeps overwhelming us with them, perhaps to give us the impression that this weird freak is really a genius. He wants to figure something out, but no one knows what. Except for his similarly afflicted professor. And some kind of company that keeps chasing him. And a Jewish secret sect that is looking for the same number as our protagonist, and looking for it because that number means... a stupid point. Seriously, I had my work cut out for me to make it to the end - the unintentionally funny (i.e., awkwardly ridiculous and self-parodying) end. Such a short film and yet so long. Thanks at least for the black and white pictures, which I have a weakness for.__P.S. I never liked math, but that's not related to my rating.
()
Darren Aronofsky's first film didn't sit well with me, which I blame on the excessive amount of mathematical phenomena, numbers and whatnot. It's admittedly a pretty flimsy excuse that can barely compensate for my (by local standards) low rating, but I take Pi as a warm-up and a gateway to other depressing films by the director – in fact, I found many elements and scenes here that also appear in Requiem for a Dream and Black Swan, for example. The cinematography is great, as is the editing, the sound and the properly grainy-black-depressing image. In short, a film I probably wouldn't watch a second time, but I that certainly don’t want to disparage, because it certainly has its artistic merit.
()
I like self-destructive characters and Darren Aronofsky managed to write a script that presents such a character. It's clear from the beginning that it can't end well, but it doesn't matter, because there is a build-up, and it's incredible. Darren manages to capture the madness of the mind in an absolutely surreal way just by the way he uses the camera and editing. Moreover, black and white suits the film perfectly. This is definitely one of those debuts that are worth it.
()
Mainos