Ohjaus:
Jan HřebejkKäsikirjoitus:
Petr JarchovskýKuvaus:
Bartek CierlicaSävellys:
Petr OstrouchovNäyttelijät:
Anna Fialová, Aňa Geislerová, Martin Finger, Ivan Lupták, Filip Březina, Gabriela Míčová, Klára Melíšková, Karel Dobrý, David Novotný (lisää)Juonikuvaukset(1)
The ZAHRADNICTVÍ (GARDEN STORE) trilogy consists of three separate films, all taking place in Czechoslovakia, set against the backdrop of some of the most dramatic periods of the past century (1939-1959), starting with WWII, covering the period of post-war optimism, and ending with the rise of the Communist dictatorship. It tells the story of three related families: the family of an air radio operator, the family of the owner of a hair salon, and the family of a garden store owner. The trilogy encompasses twenty years of the lives of its characters, who had to live out the best years of their lives in these complicated times.
NÁPADNÍK (SUITOR) takes place towards the end of the 1950s and tells the story of family relationships marked by the war and the Communist coup. It depicts the generational clash between the pre-war and post-war generations from a tragicomic perspective. Suitor is a romantic comedy about the ideas parents have about the happiness of their children. (Cinemart)
(lisää)Videot (1)
Arvostelut (3)
The best installment in the trilogy. Still a completely incoherent mess full of unnecessary scenes, unspoken motivations, incomprehensible characters and, in the tradition of this creative duo, insanely mishandled dialogue. I have two theories about why the Garden Store trilogy looks the way it does. I'm drawn to the first by the many glaring formal errors, especially in the editing. Often the cut often later than it should, sometimes it comes earlier. They fail at portraying transitions in time. All of a sudden, between two interior scenes, there is a shot of the protagonists in Stromovka Park in Prague, such that you can’t tell what it’s supposed to be telling you. In a film this well-funded I would never have expected that a second camera would appear at the edge of the frame or that no one would notice a microphone dipping into the frame. It gives me the feeling that Hřebejk got real tired of it sometime early on and tried to spend as little time on it as possible, and the longer the production went on, the more his mind was elsewhere. He probably didn't show up for post-production at all. My second theory is prompted by how the entire trilogy is so inhuman, mechanical, and lifeless. It's quite possible that an artificial intelligence was behind it, into which all (ALL!) of Hřebejk's previous films were uploaded as a frame of reference for it to use to create its own film. There are those attempts at poetic moments, the absurdity of the mundane, there is the indictment of human small-mindedness, the minor courage, the strong gestures, the tragedy and reconciliation. But it all seems to have been coldly compiled on the basis of these buzzwords alone. A silly but appealingly intimate scene of a couple getting back together over the phone is immediately ruined by the girl bounding out of the post office and dancing in the streets. An equally goofy but potentially quite endearing scene in which the whole family discovers that their daughter is still innocent because she has guilelessly blown up a condom like a balloon, such that they all poke at it out of relief, is degraded by the fact that it all has to be said out loud. And now it occurs to me – why did she break up with him in the first place? Geez, I hope it wasn't because she was scared after hearing her aunt's story that her vagina might reject her boyfriend's penis, was it? Jeez, now that I think about it, it must have been. Noooo.
()
It’s an enjoyable comedy that, even without all the gardening context, has the chops to become more human. The truth is that the feud between the youth and their parents will never go away. At the same time, it's a fitting response to the squeamish who were expecting to laugh one more time. Now, they can go all out.
()
If director Hřebejk had taken the trouble to turn the trilogy into a TV series, if he had divided it into at least six parts, and if he had played more with some of the motifs and left some out, this might have been really good. The way that it is, the trilogy tends to grow in quality, but even the last film isn't really great and doesn't wow you.
()
Mainos