Ohjaus:
Jon FavreauKäsikirjoitus:
Jeff NathansonKuvaus:
Caleb DeschanelNäyttelijät:
Donald Glover, Seth Rogen, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Beyoncé, James Earl Jones, Alfre Woodard, Billy Eichner, John Kani, John Oliver, Florence Kasumba (lisää)Suoratoistopalvelut (5)
Juonikuvaukset(1)
Disney esittää ohjaaja Jon Favreaun uuden live action -version elokuvasta Leijonakuningas, joka vie meidät Afrikan savannille, missä tuleva kuningas on juuri syntynyt. Simba ihailee isäänsä kuningas Mufasaa ja ottaa omat kuninkaalliset velvollisuutensa vakavasti. Mufasan veli Scar - juuri syrjäytetty kruununperijä - punoo omia juoniaan. Taistelu Jylhäkallion herruudesta, joka on täynnä petosta, tragediaa ja draamaa, johtaa Simban karkotukseen. Apunaan pari uutta, hauskaa ystävää Simba joutuu pohtimaan, miten isoksi kasvettuaan ottaa takaisin oman paikkansa. (Walt Disney Nordic Fin.)
(lisää)Videot (22)
Arvostelut (14)
Alkuperäinen elokuva ei ole vielä niin vanha, että uudelle versiolle olisi tarvetta, ja tässä onkin ollut kyse vain uudesta CGI-asusta – ja epäilemättä rahasta. Eikä Beyoncé vie minulta jalkoja alta, hänen esityksensä ei lainkaan lumoa, ja kaikki muut laulut ovat amatöörien esittämiä. Ihan oikeasti, mitä odotat Seth Rogenin tai John Oliverin laulusuoritukselta? Eli mikäli haluat nähdä huippunykyaikaisen animaation, tässä se tulee, muussa tapauksessa parempi katsoa alkuperäisversio.
()
Jon Favreau got probably excited about new animation technology because after beautiful The Jungle Book he filmed no less amazing The Lion King. And even though the story is well known and you heard the music a hundred times, it is still brilliant and I was captivated by this remake. And it is precisely this technology that makes me feel as if real living creatures were wandering through that bush. I was even horrified a little by the thought I had while watching this movie that the kids in the future might watch this kind of movies and think what a wonderful world we used to have...
()
The essence of sterility. Beautiful yet pointless. I wonder what Favreau's role as director was. It couldn't have been more than sending out two mass emails: one to the actors "put on The Lion King and say the same thing", and the other to the thousands of hopefuls behind the rendering computers "put on The Lion King, forget the emotions in the faces and otherwise do the same thing using CGI and share the result with me in a few years". There is not a single ounce of invention, no interpretation, let alone an original idea. On the other hand, the glitz is so intoxicating and the original material and music so catchy that if you have to take your kids to see it, at least it won’t a complete waste of time.
()
A new version of the classic Disney story about Simba, who grew from a little lion cub into the king of animals and avenged his father's death. The new Lion King looks incredibly realistic, but the moment the animals start talking and singing, it starts to fall apart. The fairytale atmosphere where no one bothered with the chatty animals is gone, and in its new form it all feels a bit out of place. Still, it's an inoffensive adventure that will appeal to older viewers with its nostalgia and younger ones with its songs and lots of animals. But it is far from an exceptional film.
()
I felt as uncomfortable watching the new Lion King as I would have felt watching natural history documentaries with narration that jokingly imitates the “voices” of animals. At the same time, it is an inordinately long (and drawn-out) film, very dark (the hyenas could sign up for a horror-movie casting call) and verbose, i.e. not very suitable for younger viewers who would most likely appreciate the talking fauna. I very much enjoyed Caleb Deschanel’s camera work, which was adapted to the characters’ point of view, and one wordless scene including the odyssey of a dung beetle with a ball of giraffe droppings. Otherwise, a negative feeling of inappropriateness predominated. When you see a photo-realistically animated (and talking) warthog and a (talking) meerkat tame a (talking) lion cub and turn it into an entomophage, it is more disturbing than funny or cute. Whereas I can still be impressed by the original to this day, the reboot just makes me want to cry over the idea that it will be a huge commercial hit and Disney will continue to churn out such empty, asexual, absolutely unsurprising remakes of its successful films. The Jungle Book had a faster pace and more convincing characters, and it did not merely copy the original film, but developed it in a meaningful manner. It was unique in some way. Conversely, The Lion King is only a soulless imitation, perhaps technologically perfect, but almost worthless artistically. 50%
()
Kuvagalleria (52)
Kuva © Walt Disney Pictures
![Leijonakuningas - Kuvat elokuvasta](http://image.pmgstatic.com/cache/resized/w663/files/images/film/photos/163/612/163612933_5cacf3.jpg)
Mainos