Pelin säännöt

  • Suomi Spelets regler (lisää)
Traileri 1

Suoratoistopalvelut (1)

Juonikuvaukset(1)

Juonittelua, vilunkipeliä ja romanttisia juonenkäänteitä riittää, kun joukko aristokraatteja ja heidän palvelijansa kokoontuvat viikonlopun ajaksi linnaan metsästämään kaneja – ja v astakkaista sukupuolta. Porvarilliset ranskalaiset raivostuivat Pelin säännöistä. Elokuvan maailmanensi-ilta järjestettiin Pariisissa vuonna 1939. Se päättyi mellakkaan, kun yleisö yritti sytyttää näytöspaikan tuleen. (Future film)

(lisää)

Arvostelut (2)

Priorisoi:

Matty 

kaikki käyttäjän arvostelut

englanti Sometimes there is a thin line separating overrated works and masterpieces. Chosen by film experts again this year as one of the ten best films of all time, The Rules of the Game comes across as stale and – though I don’t like to admit this about any film – boring. Renoir’s humanism doesn’t fit with the cynical, hypocritical and affected members of the bourgeoisie. Rather than being critical, the tone of the film is conciliatory; rather than satire, The Rules of the Game is reminiscent of a Clair-esque madcap comedy, which suddenly breaks down into a serious drama at the end. If I show leniency in evaluating Renoir’s ambitious (the film was a flop despite its large budget), lengthy and repetitive project, that is because of its formalistic aspect. Renoir’s work with multiple image planes, in which something or someone is usually in motion, does not distract the viewer’s attention, but sharpens it. Meanings are not formed through editing, but with the camera itself, without our assistance. The Rules of the Game manages to keep us on our toes with flawlessly organised entrances and exits of the characters. If that’s not enough for such a celebrated film…well, maybe it is. 75% ()

kaylin 

kaikki käyttäjän arvostelut

englanti A charming, satirical comedy that knows exactly when to strike. Jean Renoir was such a brilliant filmmaker that he handled this wonderfully and presented to us the upper class with all its character traits, for which it deserves criticism. Renoir could have been even more impactful, even more ruthless, but it suffices as it is. ()